Comments on: Blogging, Facebooking and the law continued https://meejalaw.com/2010/10/25/blogging-facebooking-and-the-law-continued/ News, resources & discussion for digital publishers Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:10:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Matt Wardman https://meejalaw.com/2010/10/25/blogging-facebooking-and-the-law-continued/#comment-73 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:34:31 +0000 http://meejalaw.journallocal.co.uk/?p=423#comment-73 Hi Judith

I’m with @dontgetfooled.

The Beeb are accepting what is no more than an allegation – that in the complainant’s opinion a statement is defamatory – as fact. That is not even neutral.

We all know that statements made by solicitors/lawyers in non-evidential letters have as much authority as they would on toilet paper, but with a threatening name attached. Unfortunately some members of the public don’t.

Equally, anyone who makes allegations of violence without solid proof deserves to be exposed.

Rgds

]]> By: Law and Media Round Up – 1 November 2010 « Inforrm's Blog https://meejalaw.com/2010/10/25/blogging-facebooking-and-the-law-continued/#comment-72 Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:36:59 +0000 http://meejalaw.journallocal.co.uk/?p=423#comment-72 [...] a post on her Meejalaw blog, Judith Townend mentions our post on “Blogging the Law” and then has an interesting discussion [...]

]]>