<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media law and ethics &#187; edward garnier</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/edward-garnier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meejalaw.com</link>
	<description>News, resources &#38; discussion for digital publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='meejalaw.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="/osd.xml" title="Media law and ethics" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>Law and Media Round Up – 15 April 2013</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2013/04/16/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/</link>
		<comments>https://meejalaw.com/2013/04/16/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jtownend]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law mop-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edward garnier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inforrm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media reform coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=3492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defamation Bill is now coming to the end of its passage through Parliament. On 16 April 2013 it will be back before the Commons on “ping pong”, the stage at which the Commons considers new amendments made by the &#8230; <a href="/2013/04/16/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=meejalaw.com&#038;blog=21851203&#038;post=3492&#038;subd=meejalaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/defamation.html" target="_blank">Defamation Bill</a> is now coming to the end of its passage through Parliament. On 16 April 2013 it will be back before the Commons on “ping pong”, the stage at which the Commons considers new amendments made by the House of Lords. As Inforrm noted here, <a href="http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/defamation-bill-back-in-the-commons-and-more-amendments/" target="_blank">in a post</a> examining the detail of the Amendments, there were <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0139/20130139.1-4.html" target="_blank">16 Lords Amendments</a>. Conservative MP and former Solicitor-General, Sir Edward Garnier, has sought to remove Amendment 2.<span id="more-20889"></span></p>
<p>The Libel Reform campaign <a href="http://libelreform.org/news/542-libel-reform-campaign-condemns-attack-on-defamation-bill" target="_blank">has condemned</a> the proposal to remove the clause which would require corporations to show financial damage before they can sue for libel. The Media Reform Coalition <a href="http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/www.mediareform.org.uk/press-ethics-and-regulation/proposal-to-neuter-defamation-bill-would-wreck-the-leveson-balance" target="_blank">argues that the clauses are crucial</a>: &#8220;<em>Without a requirement to show damage, there is a danger that companies can use libel courts as an arm of their PR operations, simply suppressing what they don’t want in the public sphere&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/">Full round up at Inforrm&#8217;s Blog&#8230;</a></p><br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/meejalaw.wordpress.com/3492/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/meejalaw.wordpress.com/3492/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=meejalaw.com&#038;blog=21851203&#038;post=3492&#038;subd=meejalaw&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://meejalaw.com/2013/04/16/law-and-media-round-up-15-april-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/49a452eaa72178c0e8f084345ab5a24b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jtownend</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
