<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super injunctions</title>
	<atom:link href="/super-injunctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meejalaw.com</link>
	<description>News, resources &#38; discussion for digital publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a SuperInjunction? &#124; injunctionsblog</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is a SuperInjunction? &#124; injunctionsblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-1818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions the term, superinjunction, came into existence in 2009 after a major media outlet reported jokingly [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to <a href="/super-injunctions" rel="nofollow">https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions</a> the term, superinjunction, came into existence in 2009 after a major media outlet reported jokingly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What would the Man on the Clapham Omnibus make of digital media law? &#124; Media law and ethics</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What would the Man on the Clapham Omnibus make of digital media law? &#124; Media law and ethics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for digital publishers      Skip to content HomeAboutContactArticles&#160;elsewhereResearchSuper&#160;injunctionsBloggersMedia law&#160;diaryUseful&#160;links        &#8592; The media regulation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] for digital publishers      Skip to content HomeAboutContactArticles&nbsp;elsewhereResearchSuper&nbsp;injunctionsBloggersMedia law&nbsp;diaryUseful&nbsp;links        &larr; The media regulation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does the public think about privacy injunctions? &#171; Law, Justice and Journalism</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What does the public think about privacy injunctions? &#171; Law, Justice and Journalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its definition of a super injunction, or acknowledged the complexities of this phrase. As I have explained elsewhere, there is a distinction between an anonymous privacy injunction and a secret &#8216;super&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] its definition of a super injunction, or acknowledged the complexities of this phrase. As I have explained elsewhere, there is a distinction between an anonymous privacy injunction and a secret &#8216;super&#8217; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Turner</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every 2nd year law student knows the maxims of equity, or at least they know the ones that count here.  &quot;He who comes to equity must come with clean hands&quot;  how do adulterers have these metaphorical clean hands?  Equity acts in personam.  Law in rem.  That makes the concept of injunctions &quot;against persons unknown&quot; or contra mundum (against the world) a nonsense.  Since some of our judges firmly believe that our silly antiquated secrecy culture can be exported let them think on this one.  A certain politician in a land far far away gets annoyed at bad press he reads in our media.  He pops down to the court in his capaital city and gets his judges to injunct contra mundum.  Do our judges accept that this injunction is enforecable here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every 2nd year law student knows the maxims of equity, or at least they know the ones that count here.  &#8220;He who comes to equity must come with clean hands&#8221;  how do adulterers have these metaphorical clean hands?  Equity acts in personam.  Law in rem.  That makes the concept of injunctions &#8220;against persons unknown&#8221; or contra mundum (against the world) a nonsense.  Since some of our judges firmly believe that our silly antiquated secrecy culture can be exported let them think on this one.  A certain politician in a land far far away gets annoyed at bad press he reads in our media.  He pops down to the court in his capaital city and gets his judges to injunct contra mundum.  Do our judges accept that this injunction is enforecable here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2011-05-23 &#124; Joanna Geary</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2011-05-23 &#124; Joanna Geary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Super injunctions &#124; media law &amp; ethics An updating page about the English court orders known as “super injunctions”. Please contact jt.townend@gmail.com with more detail about the history of these orders. (tags: law) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Super injunctions | media law &amp; ethics An updating page about the English court orders known as “super injunctions”. Please contact <a href="mailto:jt.townend@gmail.com">jt.townend@gmail.com</a> with more detail about the history of these orders. (tags: law) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The weird legal world of WikiLeaks &#124; Marta Cooper</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The weird legal world of WikiLeaks &#124; Marta Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 03:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the existence of the gagging order is itself a breach, likening it to the superinjunctions currently stirring opinion and grabbing column space in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the existence of the gagging order is itself a breach, likening it to the superinjunctions currently stirring opinion and grabbing column space in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media law mop up: Mosley defeat; injunctions by tweet; and Wikileaks gag &#124; media law &#38; ethics</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media law mop up: Mosley defeat; injunctions by tweet; and Wikileaks gag &#124; media law &#38; ethics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProject 2010Super injunctionsMidweek mop upMedia law diaryUseful links        &#8592; Rusbridger: &#8216;The Guardian has never [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProject 2010Super injunctionsMidweek mop upMedia law diaryUseful links        &larr; Rusbridger: &#8216;The Guardian has never [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The marred privacy injunction &#124; media law &#38; ethics</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/super-injunctions/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The marred privacy injunction &#124; media law &#38; ethics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?page_id=898#comment-44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProject 2010Super injunctionsMidweek mop upMedia law diaryUseful links        &#8592; Midweek media law mop up: Privacy rights and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProject 2010Super injunctionsMidweek mop upMedia law diaryUseful links        &larr; Midweek media law mop up: Privacy rights and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
