<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How should privacy injunctions be reported?</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/09/06/how-should-privacy-injunctions-be-reported/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meejalaw.com/2012/09/06/how-should-privacy-injunctions-be-reported/</link>
	<description>News, resources &#38; discussion for digital publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 07:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A dearth of data about defamation cases in England and Wales – Judith Townend &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2012/09/06/how-should-privacy-injunctions-be-reported/#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A dearth of data about defamation cases in England and Wales – Judith Townend &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=2877#comment-2619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post has mainly focussed on data about claims and cases, but we also lack evidence about the cost of cases (see, for example, the discussion here). There are issues around the collection of privacy case data too. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post has mainly focussed on data about claims and cases, but we also lack evidence about the cost of cases (see, for example, the discussion here). There are issues around the collection of privacy case data too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A dearth of data about defamation cases in England &#38; Wales &#124; Media law and ethics</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2012/09/06/how-should-privacy-injunctions-be-reported/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A dearth of data about defamation cases in England &#38; Wales &#124; Media law and ethics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=2877#comment-2576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post has mainly focussed on data about claims and cases, but we also lack evidence about the cost of cases (see, for example, the discussion here).  There are issues around the collection of privacy case data too. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post has mainly focussed on data about claims and cases, but we also lack evidence about the cost of cases (see, for example, the discussion here).  There are issues around the collection of privacy case data too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How should privacy injunctions be reported? &#8211; Judith Townend &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2012/09/06/how-should-privacy-injunctions-be-reported/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How should privacy injunctions be reported? &#8211; Judith Townend &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=2877#comment-2527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post originally appeared on the Meeja Law blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post originally appeared on the Meeja Law blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
