<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR&#8217;s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly spread</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/</link>
	<description>news, resources &#38; discussion for online publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 07:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTownend</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>JTownend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=549#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I agree it would be a difficult one to implement. Even with the new RT system designed to stop editing of tweets, people still get round it (me included) in order to add an extra comment. 

The discussion has continued since I wrote this post. See:
http://www.regrettheerror.com/2011/01/17/what-would-a-twitter-correction-function-look-like/

http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/digital-strategies/114595/live-chat-how-should-journalists-handle-incorrect-tweets/

&amp; Quora: http://www.quora.com/How-might-a-Twitter-correction-tool-work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it would be a difficult one to implement. Even with the new RT system designed to stop editing of tweets, people still get round it (me included) in order to add an extra comment. </p>
<p>The discussion has continued since I wrote this post. See:<br />
<a href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/2011/01/17/what-would-a-twitter-correction-function-look-like/" rel="nofollow">http://www.regrettheerror.com/2011/01/17/what-would-a-twitter-correction-function-look-like/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/digital-strategies/114595/live-chat-how-should-journalists-handle-incorrect-tweets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/digital-strategies/114595/live-chat-how-should-journalists-handle-incorrect-tweets/</a></p>
<p>&amp; Quora: <a href="http://www.quora.com/How-might-a-Twitter-correction-tool-work" rel="nofollow">http://www.quora.com/How-might-a-Twitter-correction-tool-work</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip John</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=549#comment-87</guid>
		<description>The &#039;correction&#039; idea is a nice one though I can&#039;t see it ever happening. Imagine the fun phishers and spammers would have changing links...

IMO deleting that original tweet would have been perfectly justified, so long as another tweet correcting the falsity was sent out. That&#039;d get rid of all the Twitter RTs and then any &#039;old style&#039; RTs would not be traceable to the original, leaving them questionable.

Perhaps news organisations should have a tool on standby that allows them to mass reply to everyone who RTs something, just in case. Open to abuse though, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;correction&#8217; idea is a nice one though I can&#8217;t see it ever happening. Imagine the fun phishers and spammers would have changing links&#8230;</p>
<p>IMO deleting that original tweet would have been perfectly justified, so long as another tweet correcting the falsity was sent out. That&#8217;d get rid of all the Twitter RTs and then any &#8216;old style&#8217; RTs would not be traceable to the original, leaving them questionable.</p>
<p>Perhaps news organisations should have a tool on standby that allows them to mass reply to everyone who RTs something, just in case. Open to abuse though, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=549#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Really interesting to read the comments from NPR&#039;s Andy Carvin and Alex Gubbay from BBC News&#039; social media team to find out more about the decisions made in tweeting the news - also for the views on deleting vs keeping inaccurate news tweets as part of the record of the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting to read the comments from NPR&#8217;s Andy Carvin and Alex Gubbay from BBC News&#8217; social media team to find out more about the decisions made in tweeting the news &#8211; also for the views on deleting vs keeping inaccurate news tweets as part of the record of the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday media law mop up: Clegg on libel, NOTW suspension &#38; Twitter debates &#124; media law &#38; ethics</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday media law mop up: Clegg on libel, NOTW suspension &#38; Twitter debates &#124; media law &#38; ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=549#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] media law &amp; ethics   news, resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProjectUseful links        &#8592; Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR&#8217;s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly sprea... [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] media law &amp; ethics   news, resources &amp; discussion for online publishers    Skip to content HomeAboutContactProjectUseful links        &larr; Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR&#8217;s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly sprea&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR’s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly spread &#124; media law &#38; ethics -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>https://meejalaw.com/2011/01/10/correcting-the-error-on-twitter-how-nprs-mistake-about-arizona-shooting-quickly-spread/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR’s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly spread &#124; media law &#38; ethics -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://meejalaw.com/?p=549#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by malcolm coles, Judith Townend, Media Law UK and others. Media Law UK said: Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR’s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly spread: Thoughtless ... http://bit.ly/fWw2Sr #medialaw [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by malcolm coles, Judith Townend, Media Law UK and others. Media Law UK said: Correcting the error on Twitter: how NPR’s mistake about Arizona shooting quickly spread: Thoughtless &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/fWw2Sr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fWw2Sr</a> #medialaw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
